![]() ![]() ![]() The main advantage of MAK is that once a machine is activated, it will stay activated as long as you don't make major changes to the computer. Thus, you always have to ensure that your KMS infrastructure is working properly. The biggest downside of KMS is that Office clients have to be activated again after 180 days. ![]() In such an environment KMS is probably the better option. Some organizations deploy new OS images when major updates are required, such as Windows service packs, or when a user has messed up his desktop. Limited number of MAK activationsĪnother downside of MAK activation is that whenever you have to reinstall a machine, the number of possible installations with the corresponding MAK key is reduced by one. ![]() However, you can also automate the MAK deployment process. By contrast, MAK requires that you ensure activation whenever you install Office 2010. Once your KMS host is running and activated, you usually won't be bothered again with activation issues. The biggest advantage of KMS is that the Office clients don't have to be configured. If you have more than 50 Office 2010 machines, Microsoft recommends going for KMS. You need at least 5 Office 2010 installations if you want to activate Office 2010 with KMS however, Microsoft recommends using MAK activation if your network has fewer than 25 computers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |